{"id":6450,"date":"2026-10-18T01:00:30","date_gmt":"2026-10-18T01:00:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/analise-de-custos-manutencao\/"},"modified":"2026-10-18T01:00:31","modified_gmt":"2026-10-18T01:00:31","slug":"analise-de-custos-manutencao","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/fr\/analise-de-custos-manutencao\/","title":{"rendered":"Maintenance Cost Analysis: Why Last Year\u2019s Budget Misleads Managers"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"bsf_rt_marker\"><\/div><\/p>\n<p>Treat maintenance cost analysis as life-cycle costing: weigh planned maintenance spend against the cost of failures, not against last year\u2019s budget. Evidence from <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nist.gov\/news-events\/news\/2020\/06\/research-suggests-significant-benefits-investing-advanced-machinery\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">NIST maintenance mix statistics<\/a> and the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.iso.org\/standard\/64076.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">ISO 14224 data taxonomy<\/a> points to one first step: standardise your work-order data, and capture direct and indirect costs, before running any model. A system such as Fullyops can collect that data.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<blockquote>\n<p><strong>En bref<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>NIST reports that reactive work averaged 45.7% of maintenance activity; establishments relying most on it reported about 3.3 times more downtime than proactive peers.<\/li>\n<li>Track downtime, defects, and inventory carrying costs alongside labor, parts, contractors, and inspections, then normalize totals by operating hour, output, or replacement value.<\/li>\n<li>Treat the 80% planned and 20% reactive target as a guide; critical assets need more planned work, while cheap, redundant assets may run to failure.<\/li>\n<li>Replace an asset when discounted maintenance and downtime costs exceed the cost of a new one, using a discount rate agreed with finance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/blockquote>\n<hr>\n<div data-blg-cta=\"after_tldr\" data-blg-cta-layout=\"banner\" style=\"margin:28px 0;font-family:-apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif\">\n<div style=\"border-radius:26px;padding:min(22px,3.2vw)\">\n<div style=\"background:#151b24;border-radius:18px;overflow:hidden\">\n<div style=\"padding:34px 30px;text-align:center\">\n<div style=\"margin:0 0 18px\"><span style=\"max-width:100%;border-radius:999px;padding:6px 13px;font-size:12px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:0.1em;text-transform:uppercase;line-height:1.3;background:#E8EAED;color:#1f2937\">Fullyops<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"font-size:26px;font-weight:800;line-height:1.2;letter-spacing:-0.01em;color:#f3f5f8;margin:0\">Make Maintenance Costs Visible<\/div>\n<div style=\"width:56px;height:6px;border-radius:3px;background:#E8EAED;margin:12px 0 14px;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto\"><\/div>\n<div style=\"font-size:15px;line-height:1.55;color:#9aa5b5;margin:0 0 24px;max-width:44em;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto\">Fullyops brings work orders, intervention tracking, time records, inventory, and operational analysis into one platform for maintenance teams.<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/book-demo\/\" style=\"align-items:center;gap:9px;border-radius:10px;font-weight:700;font-size:15px;text-decoration:none;padding:13px 22px 13px 26px;background:#E8EAED;color:#1f2937\">Demandez une d\u00e9monstration<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2 id=\"table-of-contents\">Table des mati\u00e8res<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#what-are-maintenance-costs-and-which-types-should-you-track\">What are maintenance costs, and which types should you track?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#how-do-you-calculate-maintenance-costs\">How do you calculate maintenance costs?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#planned-versus-unplanned-maintenance-what-do-the-costs-and-targets-look-like\">Planned versus unplanned maintenance: what do the costs and targets look like?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#how-does-life-cycle-cost-analysis-support-maintenance-decisions\">How does life-cycle cost analysis support maintenance decisions?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#which-practical-levers-reduce-maintenance-costs-fastest\">Which practical levers reduce maintenance costs fastest?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#why-do-data-quality-and-a-single-source-of-truth-decide-your-results\">Why do data quality and a single source of truth decide your results?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#our-view-three-priorities-for-this-quarter\">Our view: three priorities for this quarter<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#how-can-fullyops-help-you-act-on-this-analysis\">How can Fullyops help you act on this analysis?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#faq\">FAQ<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#sources\">Sources<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 id=\"what-are-maintenance-costs-and-which-types-should-you-track\">What are maintenance costs, and which types should you track?<\/h2>\n<p>A usable analysis starts with agreed categories. Without them, two sites or two years cannot be compared, and every figure becomes an argument about definitions.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Co\u00fbts directs<\/strong> are the ones that appear on a work order or invoice. <strong>Co\u00fbts indirects<\/strong> are the ones that surface elsewhere in the business, often much larger and rarely recorded.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Direct:<\/strong> technician labour, spare parts and consumables, contractor and call-out fees, inspection and testing charges.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Indirect:<\/strong> lost production during downtime, lost sales, quality defects after a failure, inventory held as a buffer against breakdowns, and administrative overhead for ordering and approvals.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Your maintenance approach decides how those costs split. <strong>Reactive (corrective)<\/strong> maintenance fixes things after they fail. <strong>Pr\u00e9ventive<\/strong> maintenance follows a calendar or usage schedule. <strong>Pr\u00e9dictif<\/strong> maintenance acts on measured condition, such as vibration, temperature or oil quality. <strong>Fonctionnement jusqu'\u00e0 la panne<\/strong> is a deliberate form of reactive maintenance, sensible for cheap, non-critical, easily replaced items and costly almost everywhere else.<\/p>\n<p>Classification matters as much as the categories. ISO 14224:2016 defines a standard way to record equipment taxonomy, failure data and maintenance actions. Adopting its logic, even partially, means a \u201cbearing failure\u201d is recorded the same way by every technician. That consistency is what lets you merge, compare and trust the data later.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"how-do-you-calculate-maintenance-costs\">How do you calculate maintenance costs?<\/h2>\n<p>Start by collecting the inputs for each asset over a fixed period:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Labour:<\/strong> hours worked multiplied by the loaded hourly rate, including overtime.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Parts and materials:<\/strong> issued from stock or bought for the job.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Contractor fees:<\/strong> call-outs, specialist repairs and calibration.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Inspection and testing:<\/strong> planned checks, statutory tests, condition monitoring subscriptions.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Inventory carrying cost:<\/strong> capital tied up in spares, storage, insurance and obsolescence.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Downtime cost:<\/strong> lost production hours multiplied by contribution margin per hour.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Capital replacement and disposal:<\/strong> major overhauls, end-of-life replacement and removal.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The total maintenance cost for an asset is then:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Total = Labour + Parts + Contractors + Inspection + Inventory carrying + Downtime + Replacement and disposal<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Here is an illustrative example, with inputs that are assumptions, not market data. Say a packaging line has labour, parts, contractor, inspection and inventory carrying costs, along with production losses from downtime. The total cost includes all of these, and downtime can account for a substantial share. If you counted only work-order costs, you would miss the wider impact. Scaling the example across similar lines shows how quickly those costs can add up.<\/p>\n<p>Raw totals do not travel well between assets, so normalise them:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Cost per operating hour:<\/strong> useful for comparing machines with different duty cycles.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Cost per unit produced:<\/strong> ties maintenance to output and margin.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Percentage of replacement value:<\/strong> flags assets that have become more expensive to keep than to replace.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>For multi-year decisions, future costs must be discounted to present value, which is standard practice in life-cycle costing. The discount rate is a financial judgement, so involve finance early rather than choosing one yourself.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><strong>Reactive work is the largest share of maintenance activity.<\/strong> NIST data reports that surveyed manufacturers spent on average 45.7% of maintenance activity on reactive work, which is the first number to check against your own mix.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h2 id=\"planned-versus-unplanned-maintenance-what-do-the-costs-and-targets-look-like\">Planned versus unplanned maintenance: what do the costs and targets look like?<\/h2>\n<p>The same NIST research gives the most useful benchmark for maintenance effort. In plain terms, almost half of the typical maintenance effort is spent responding to breakdowns, with all the disruption that implies: emergency parts orders, overtime, idle operators and rescheduled production.<\/p>\n<p>The penalties of leaning on reactive work are consistent:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Establishments that relied most heavily on reactive maintenance reported about 3.3 times more downtime than their proactive peers.<\/li>\n<li>They also reported more product defects and larger inventory increases, because spares and work-in-progress are stocked as insurance.<\/li>\n<li>Establishments with more predictive maintenance showed about 15% less downtime, plus fewer defects and smaller inventory increases.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Further NIST analysis of machinery maintenance describes the aggregate losses as substantial, and reaches the same conclusion: organisations less dependent on reactive work achieved major reductions in downtime, defects and inventory.<\/p>\n<p>Practitioner guidance sets a target. The <a href=\"https:\/\/swefc.unm.edu\/iamf\/life-cycle-costing-operation-maintenance-maintenance-types\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Integrated Asset Management Framework<\/a> recommends roughly <strong>80% planned and 20% reactive<\/strong> work for many industrial assets. Treat that as a direction, not a rule. A critical, single-point-of-failure asset deserves a higher planned share. A low-cost, redundant one can justify more run-to-failure. Set targets by criticality class, then track the planned percentage monthly and watch where the unplanned remainder is concentrated.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/media.babylovegrowth.ai\/blog-images\/organization-13009\/1792141664956_Planned-versus-unplanned-maintenance-what-do-the-costs-and-targets-look-like-overview-diagram.jpeg\" alt=\"Planned versus unplanned maintenance: what do the costs and targets look like? \u2014 overview diagram\"><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"how-does-life-cycle-cost-analysis-support-maintenance-decisions\">How does life-cycle cost analysis support maintenance decisions?<\/h2>\n<p>Life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) puts every cost of owning an asset on one timeline: acquisition, operation, maintenance, downtime and disposal. Because those costs fall in different years, they are discounted to present value so options can be compared fairly. The Integrated Asset Management Framework describes maintenance as an investment rather than a pure cost, with a \u201csweet spot\u201d where maintenance spend balances against the cost of failures to minimise whole-life cost.<\/p>\n<p>A practical LCCA follows these steps:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Determine the useful life<\/strong> of the asset or the study period.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Estimate all cost categories<\/strong> for each alternative: purchase, energy, labour, parts, downtime, disposal.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Estimate residual value<\/strong> at the end of the period.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Discount all costs<\/strong> to present value using a rate agreed with finance.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Compare alternatives<\/strong> on total discounted cost, and test how sensitive the answer is to your assumptions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The same logic answers three recurring questions. When should you replace instead of repair? Replace when the discounted cost of continued maintenance and downtime exceeds that of a new asset. Is run-to-failure acceptable? Only where the failure cost is low and the consequences are contained. Is predictive capability worth buying? Research on <a href=\"https:\/\/ieeexplore.ieee.org\/document\/9806425\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">cost-benefit analysis of maintenance plans<\/a> shows that a stochastic cost-benefit framework can balance inspection, preventive and corrective actions and quantify the reliability gains from online condition monitoring. That is exactly the evidence a business case needs.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"which-practical-levers-reduce-maintenance-costs-fastest\">Which practical levers reduce maintenance costs fastest?<\/h2>\n<p>Cost reduction rarely starts with a new technology. It starts with better information and tighter routines. These levers are ordered roughly by how soon they pay back.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Standardise taxonomy and data capture.<\/strong> Use one list of asset IDs, failure modes and actions, aligned with ISO 14224. Run routine audits so cost models rest on reliable inputs.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Log everything in one system.<\/strong> A CMMS or field service platform should record labour hours, parts used, downtime and cause for every job. Fields worth requiring: asset ID, failure code, action code, start and finish times, technician, parts issued, downtime minutes and whether the job was planned. Our guide to <a href=\"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/maintenance-reporting-hvac-asset-reliability\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">rapport de maintenance<\/a> shows how structured reports improve reliability.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Rethink inventory.<\/strong> Where predictive maintenance gives you warning, shift from large buffer stocks to pull-based replenishment. Quantify the carrying cost elements (capital, storage, insurance, obsolescence) so the saving is visible. Our <a href=\"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/inventory-tracking-guide-maintenance-efficiency\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">guide de gestion des stocks<\/a> covers the practical steps.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Optimise scheduling and workforce planning.<\/strong> Group jobs by location, cut travel time, multi-skill technicians and plan work ahead so overtime becomes the exception. Scheduling is also where <a href=\"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/solutions\/field-service-software-for-hvac-services\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">flux de travail d'intervention sur site<\/a> pay off most.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Pilot condition monitoring on critical assets.<\/strong> Prove the case on one asset before a wider rollout. The return comes from less downtime and fewer defects, as the NIST findings above suggest.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Track a short KPI set.<\/strong> Maintenance cost per operating hour, percentage of planned maintenance, mean time between failures (MTBF), downtime cost and inventory days cover most decisions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Not every asset is a pure maintenance-cost problem. Low-voltage and network systems, for example, fail in ways that mimic mechanical wear, and <a href=\"https:\/\/lowvoltagecorp.com\/what-is-network-maintenance\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">network maintenance for property managers<\/a> is a useful reference when those systems sit in your estate.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Conseil de pro :<\/strong> <em>Before you buy any monitoring hardware, rank assets by downtime cost per hour and start with the top three; a sensor on the wrong asset saves nothing.<\/em><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"why-do-data-quality-and-a-single-source-of-truth-decide-your-results\">Why do data quality and a single source of truth decide your results?<\/h2>\n<p>A cost model is only as reliable as the records that feed it. If one technician logs a seized bearing as \u201cmechanical\u201d and another as \u201cbearing failure\u201d, no analysis can separate the two. That is why ISO 14224 and data governance matter: a common language of failure modes and maintenance actions makes actual costs comparable with planned estimates, a point also made in <a href=\"https:\/\/ifluids.com\/standard\/iso-14224-reliability-failure-data-guide\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">guidance on ISO 14224 data practice<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The industry view is consistent: maintenance is an investment, and the aim is to find the point where spend balances the cost of failure. Reaching it needs ownership shared between maintenance, operations and finance, with one set of figures all three trust.<\/p>\n<p>The practical first step is modest. Run a data audit, check every work order against the agreed fields, and baseline your key metrics before changing anything.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"our-view-three-priorities-for-this-quarter\">Our view: three priorities for this quarter<\/h2>\n<p>I would start with three things, in this order. First, standardise your cost taxonomy and baseline the planned versus unplanned split. You cannot manage a ratio you have never measured, and most teams are surprised by their first honest number. Second, pilot condition monitoring on one critical asset. A single well-chosen pilot validates the predictive return in your own plant, which is worth more than any benchmark. Third, sit down with finance and run a simple LCCA for one asset class, even on a spreadsheet. The conversation about discount rates and downtime value will do as much good as the result. Expect quick wins from the first, evidence from the second and credibility from the third.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><em>\u2014 Pedro<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h2 id=\"how-can-fullyops-help-you-act-on-this-analysis\">How can Fullyops help you act on this analysis?<\/h2>\n<p>Every lever above depends on clean, centralised data. We help you move from analysis to practice with these capabilities:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Work order management that records planned and unplanned jobs against each asset.<\/li>\n<li>Time capture for accurate labour costs.<\/li>\n<li>Inventory tracking that shows parts usage and stock levels.<\/li>\n<li>Integrated reports to support maintenance analysis.<\/li>\n<li>Integrations with other systems.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Start by requesting a demo, then run a pilot on one critical asset class and export a baseline report on planned and unplanned work. Our <a href=\"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/work-order-management-process-reduce-downtime\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Guide de gestion des ordres de travail<\/a> walks through setting up that pilot, and you can compare our Basic, Professional and Advanced plans at <a href=\"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Fullyops<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"faq\">FAQ<\/h2>\n<h3 id=\"what-is-included-in-maintenance-cost-analysis\">What is included in maintenance cost analysis?<\/h3>\n<p>It covers direct costs such as labour, parts and contractor fees, and indirect costs such as downtime, defects and inventory holding. Including both gives a true picture of what maintenance and failures cost your business.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"what-is-a-good-ratio-of-planned-to-unplanned-maintenance\">What is a good ratio of planned to unplanned maintenance?<\/h3>\n<p>Practitioner guidance suggests an 80% planned and 20% reactive split for many industrial assets. The right ratio depends on asset criticality and risk, so set targets by asset class.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"how-do-you-calculate-the-total-cost-of-maintaining-an-asset\">How do you calculate the total cost of maintaining an asset?<\/h3>\n<p>Add labour, parts, contractor fees, inspection, inventory carrying cost, downtime cost and replacement or disposal costs over a fixed period. Then normalise by operating hour, unit produced or share of replacement value.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"why-does-iso-14224-matter-for-cost-analysis\">Why does ISO 14224 matter for cost analysis?<\/h3>\n<p>ISO 14224:2016 defines a standard way to record equipment taxonomy, failures and maintenance actions. That consistency makes cost data comparable across assets, sites and time.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"sources\">Sources<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nist.gov\/news-events\/news\/2020\/06\/research-suggests-significant-benefits-investing-advanced-machinery\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Research Suggests Significant Benefits to Investing in Advanced Machinery Maintenance | NIST<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/swefc.unm.edu\/iamf\/life-cycle-costing-operation-maintenance-maintenance-types\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Life Cycle Costing \/ Operation &amp; Maintenance \/ Maintenance Types &#8211; Integrated Asset Management Framework<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.iso.org\/standard\/64076.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">ISO 14224:2016 &#8211; Petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries \u2014 Collection and exchange of reliability and maintenance data for equipment<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/ieeexplore.ieee.org\/document\/9806425\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Cost-Benefit Analysis of Maintenance Plans: Case Study of the Power System of a Large Industrial Facility<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 id=\"recommended\">Recommand\u00e9<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/custo-de-paragem\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">R\u00e9duire les co\u00fbts d\u2019arr\u00eat gr\u00e2ce \u00e0 quatre registres de production pour les gestionnaires de maintenance<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/why-track-maintenance-hours-reduce-costs-boost-efficiency\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Pourquoi suivre les heures de maintenance : r\u00e9duire les co\u00fbts et am\u00e9liorer l'efficacit\u00e9<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/how-to-track-maintenance-costs-asset-management\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Comment suivre les co\u00fbts de maintenance pour une gestion d'actifs plus intelligente<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/reduce-maintenance-costs-efficient-asset-management\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">R\u00e9duire les co\u00fbts de maintenance pour une gestion efficace des actifs<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Analyze maintenance costs by comparing planned work with failures, capturing direct and indirect spend, and standardizing work order data with ISO 14224.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6452,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"content-type":"","_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[48],"tags":[8,75,35,73,112,41,77,74,78,105,69,97,53,45,32,82,86,64,96,92,83,34,43,47,36,68,44,66,63,49,102,99,67,51,93,39,37,98,107,9,11,10,100,91,103,89,55,76,90,72,95,12,31,30,61,101,38,54,29,56,104,18,17,88,65,84,80,42,110,111,40,52,59,109,62,28,57,58,50,60,85,33,71,79,70,108,87,94],"class_list":["post-6450","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-field-services-management","tag-asset","tag-asset-health","tag-asset-lifecycle-management","tag-asset-management-and-maintenance","tag-asset-tracking","tag-business-operations","tag-complete-work","tag-completed-work-orders","tag-completion-the-work","tag-create-plans","tag-customer-feedback","tag-customer-management","tag-customer-satisfaction","tag-data-integration","tag-digital","tag-digital-work-order","tag-each-asset","tag-efficiency","tag-equipment-lifecycle","tag-equipment-lifespan","tag-equipment-maintenance","tag-erp-integration","tag-erp-software","tag-fiel","tag-field-service-management","tag-field-service-management-fsm","tag-field-service-operations","tag-field-service-team","tag-field-service-team-improved","tag-field-services","tag-field-technicians","tag-folha-de-obra-oficina","tag-fsm","tag-fsm-software","tag-human-resources","tag-improving-efficiency","tag-industrial-iot-integration","tag-information-about","tag-labour","tag-lifecycle","tag-machinery","tag-maintenance","tag-maintenance-administration","tag-maintenance-costs","tag-maintenance-cycle","tag-maintenance-is-essential","tag-maintenance-management","tag-maintenance-schedules","tag-maintenance-team","tag-maintenance-work-orders","tag-make-decisions","tag-manufacture","tag-mobile-2","tag-mobile","tag-motivation","tag-objectives-of-maintenance-management","tag-open-api-integration","tag-operational-efficiency","tag-phc","tag-phc-go-add-on","tag-planning","tag-preventive","tag-preventive-maintenance","tag-preventive-maintenance-plan","tag-profitability","tag-real-time","tag-real-time-updates","tag-reduce-downtime","tag-repair-history","tag-service-interventions","tag-service-manager","tag-service-quality","tag-service-teams","tag-share-videos","tag-smart-scheduling-tools","tag-software","tag-strong-team","tag-structure-field-service-team","tag-team-training","tag-teamwork","tag-technical-support","tag-transition","tag-what-is-a-work-order","tag-work-order-includes","tag-work-order-management","tag-work-orders","tag-workflow","tag-workforce"],"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/fullyops.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/1792141623591_Manager-compares-annual-maintenance-cost-reports.jpeg?wsr",1280,720,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/fullyops.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/1792141623591_Manager-compares-annual-maintenance-cost-reports-150x150.jpeg?wsr",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/fullyops.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/1792141623591_Manager-compares-annual-maintenance-cost-reports-300x169.jpeg?wsr",300,169,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/fullyops.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/1792141623591_Manager-compares-annual-maintenance-cost-reports-768x432.jpeg?wsr",768,432,true],"large":["https:\/\/fullyops.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/1792141623591_Manager-compares-annual-maintenance-cost-reports-1024x576.jpeg?wsr",1024,576,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/fullyops.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/1792141623591_Manager-compares-annual-maintenance-cost-reports.jpeg?wsr",1280,720,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/fullyops.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/1792141623591_Manager-compares-annual-maintenance-cost-reports.jpeg?wsr",1280,720,false],"trp-custom-language-flag":["https:\/\/fullyops.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/1792141623591_Manager-compares-annual-maintenance-cost-reports-18x10.jpeg?wsr",18,10,true]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"","author_link":"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/fr\/author\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Analyze maintenance costs by comparing planned work with failures, capturing direct and indirect spend, and standardizing work order data with ISO 14224.","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6450","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6450"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6450\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6451,"href":"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6450\/revisions\/6451"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6452"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6450"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6450"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fullyops.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6450"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}